A Solution of Multi-Level Multi-Objective Optimization Models for Solid Transportation Problems under Fuzzy Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/sa32202545Keywords:
Optimization, Solid transportation problem, Fuzzy environment, Multi-level programming, UncertaintyAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive multi-level, multi-objective mathematical model to address the Solid Transportation Problem (STP) under fuzzy environments. Real-world transportation systems often face significant complexity due to uncertain parameters such as fluctuating demand, varying traffic conditions, and limited conveyance capacity. To effectively manage these uncertainties, we propose a mathematical framework that incorporates hierarchical objectives and uncertain parameters using fuzzy set theory. The model is structured across three hierarchical levels, each representing a specific goal within the transportation system: 1) minimization of transportation costs, 2) minimization of total transportation time, and 3) minimization of environmental impact costs. To manage uncertainty within model parameters, we apply two robust techniques—expected constraint programming and chance constraint programming—which transform the fuzzy model into its deterministic equivalent, allowing for more practical implementation and decision-making. The proposed model is validated through a hierarchical multi-level, multi-objective numerical illustration. This example demonstrates the effectiveness and applicability of our approach in real-world scenarios. It highlights how the model supports decision-makers in navigating trade-offs among conflicting objectives while maintaining feasibility under uncertain conditions. The results underscore the model’s potential to enhance efficiency, sustainability, and resilience in solid transportation operations.
References
Ali, W., Javaid, S., & Akbar, U. (2025). A solution of mathematical multi-objective transportation problems under uncertain environments. Palestine journal math, 14(1), 987–1014. https://pjm.ppu.edu/sites/default/files/papers/PJM_14%281%29_2025_987_to_1014.pdf
Ali, W., Sadia, S., Ahmad, F., Javaid, S., & Abidi, N. (2025). A solution programming approaches on the multi-objective capacitated fractional transportation problem. International journal of system assurance engineering and management, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02698-w
Ali, W., Sadia, S., Javaid, S., Abidi, N., Nabeel, M., Javaid, M. S., & Nusrat, A. (2025). Solving the multi-objective linear plus linear fractional programming problem using different mathematical programming approaches. Palestine journal of mathematics, 14(1). 1015–1040. https://pjm.ppu.edu/sites/default/files/papers/PJM_14%281%29_2025_1015_to_1040.pdf
Ali, W., & Javaid, S. (2025). A solution of mathematical multi-objective transportation problems using the fermatean fuzzy programming approach. International journal of system assurance engineering and management, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-025-02716-5
Mondal, A., Roy, S. K., & Midya, S. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy sustainable multi-objective multi-item multi-choice step fixed-charge solid transportation problem. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 14(6), 6975–6999. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12652-021-03554-6
Ali, W., & Javaid, S. (2023). Enhancing fermatean fuzzy transportation problems: An innovative score function-based optimization strategy. International research journal of economics and management studies IRJEMS, 2(4), 546-558. https://irjems.org/Volume-2-Issue-4/IRJEMS-V2I4P164.pdf
Schell, E. D. (1955). Distribution of a product by several properties. In Proceedings of the second symposium in linear programming (Vol. 2, pp. 615–642). Directorate of Management Analysis, DCS/Comptroller, HQ U.S. Air Force. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1574231874687990400
Haley, K. B. (1962). New methods in mathematical programming—the solid transportation problem. Operations research, 10(4), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.10.4.448
Liu, S. T. (2006). Fuzzy total transportation cost measures for fuzzy solid transportation problem. Applied mathematics and computation, 174(2), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.05.018
Peng, J., Zhang, B., Chen, L., & Li, H. (2024). A survey on uncertain graph and uncertain network optimization. Fuzzy optimization and decision making, 23(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-023-09413-7
Liu, B., & Liu, B. (2009). Theory and practice of uncertain programming (Vol. 239). Springer. https://B2n.ir/re5385
Varathan, G., & Edward J., B. (2024). A review of uncertainty management approaches for active distribution system planning. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 205, 114808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114808
Joshi, V. D., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Cepova, L., Kumar, R., & Dogra, N. (2024). Navigating uncertain distribution problem: A new approach for resolution optimization of transportation with several objectives under uncertainty. Frontiers in mechanical engineering, 10, 1389791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.1389791
Kundu, P., Kar, S., & Maiti, M. (2014). Multi-objective solid transportation problems with budget constraint in uncertain environment. International journal of systems science, 45(8), 1668–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.748944
Azimian, A., & Aouni, B. (2024). Multi-item order quantity optimization through stochastic goal programing. Annals of operations research, 346, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05903-y
Javaid, S., Ali, W., Sadia, S., & Abidi, N. (2025). Optimizing the electrical vehicle parking and charging assignments: A balanced approach using mathematical modeling. Life cycle reliability and safety engineering, 14, 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-024-00293-3
Abo-Sinna, M. A. (2001). A bi-level non-linear multi-objective decision making under fuzziness. Opsearch, 38, 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398652
Osman, M. S., Abo-Sinna, M. A., Amer, A. H., & Emam, O. (2004). A multi-level non-linear multi-objective decision-making under fuzziness. Applied mathematics and computation, 153(1), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00628-3

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the